State |
What is the rule regarding direct deposit? |
Can an employer require it? |
Alabama |
Private-sector employers may require this pay method, but public-sector employers may not. No citation is available. |
Private sector: Yes |
Alaska |
Employers cannot require direct deposit. However, employers may pay this way if an employee voluntarily authorizes it, and the wages are deposited into a financial institution of the employee’s choosing. |
No, need employee consent |
Arizona |
Employers may require direct deposit to an employee’s choice of financial institution with the employee’s consent. If no financial institution is provided, the employer may deposit the employee’s salary payments to an electronic payroll card account, if the employee agrees to it. |
No, need employee consent |
Arkansas |
The employee may opt out of this payment method by providing the employer with a written statement requesting their wages by check. |
No, need employee consent |
California |
Permitted if the employee has voluntarily consented to this payment method. |
No, need employee consent |
Colorado |
Employers may pay by direct deposit if it’s authorized by the employee and the deposits are made to the financial institution of the employee’s choosing. |
No, need employee consent |
Connecticut |
Permitted only with the written or electronic request of employees. |
No, need employee consent |
Delaware |
Only if employees sign a written request authorizing it. In lieu of cash or check, regulations adopted by the Delaware Department of Labor also authorize employers to use payroll debit cards for wage payments. |
No, need employee consent |
District of Columbia |
Private employers may not require direct deposit and only use it if employees voluntarily give written authorization. Public-sector employees may only be paid by direct deposit or delivery of the check by US mail to their residences. Citation: Private employers: D.C. Code § 32-1302. Public-sector employers: D.C. Code § 1-611.20. |
No, need employee consent |
Florida |
Upon written consent, an employer may direct deposit wages to an employee’s designated financial institution. Employers cannot fire employees who refuse authorization. |
No, employers are prohibited from requiring direct deposit. |
Georgia |
Direct deposit of wages is permitted with the consent of the employee. |
No, need employee consent |
Hawaii |
Employers may pay by direct deposit if both the employer and employee consent to it. |
No, need employee consent |
Idaho |
Permitted if voluntary written authorization is received from the employee. |
No, need employee consent |
Illinois |
Direct deposit of a paycheck into a bank or other financial institution is permitted. However, employers may not require it and employees who authorize it designate their own financial institutions. |
No, need employee consent |
Indiana |
Employers may make direct deposit mandatory, and payment must be made to the employee’s choice of financial institution. |
Yes |
Iowa |
Employers may not require employees hired before July 1, 2005, to participate, though some new hires may be required unless:
- Employee cost of establishing and maintaining an account for purposes would effectively reduce the employee’s wages to a level below the minimum wage
- The employee would incur fees because of direct deposit
- Collective bargaining agreements mutually agreed upon by the employer and the employee’s organization prohibit the employer from requiring an employee to sign up for direct deposit as a condition of hire
|
Yes (with certain stipulations) |
Kansas |
Employers can choose from the following payment methods, regardless of employee consent: (1) cash; (2) locally negotiable check or draft; (3) electronic fund transfer; or (4) payroll card. Employers who use electronic fund transfer must provide an option for employees without a bank account. |
No, need employee consent |
Kentucky |
Mandatory direct deposit is permitted, but employees must be able to withdraw their full wages at no cost. |
Yes, with stipulations |
Louisiana |
Public sector: All state-government executive branch agencies, state boards, commissions, and corporations are required to provide electronic direct deposit payroll for state employees. Private sector: No law in place. |
Public: some requirements
Private: There’s no law on the books |
Maine |
Mandatory direct deposit is allowed if the employee can withdraw their entire net pay without additional costs. Otherwise, they can choose another method. |
Yes, with stipulations |
Maryland |
Per an employee’s written authorization, an employer may pay an employee’s wages with direct deposit. |
No, need employee consent |
Massachusetts |
According to the General Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, employers may require direct deposit, but may not choose the bank. |
Yes |
Michigan |
Effective December 21, 2010, employers may require an employee to receive wages through direct deposit or payroll debit card (but certain stipulations apply). |
Yes, with stipulations |
Minnesota |
Employers may require it, with certain stipulations (if the employee receives a written objection). |
Yes, with stipulations |
Mississippi |
No state law about paying employees this way. |
No current law |
Missouri |
Wages may be paid by cash or check. Missouri has no regulations governing private companies. With certain exceptions, all state employees are required to participate. |
State employees, with stipulations |
Montana |
Employers may not require direct deposit. |
Not allowed |
Nebraska |
There are no laws currently in place. |
No current law |
Nevada |
Employers cannot require direct deposit, but employees can elect it if they can get immediate payment in full, receive at least one free transaction per pay period, any other fees are prominently disclosed and consented to in writing, and there are no other unreasonable requirements or restrictions. |
No, need employee consent |
New Hampshire |
Permitted if the employee voluntarily authorizes it to a bank of their choice. Additionally, if an employer pays employees via electronic funds transfer or direct deposit, it must also offer them the option of being paid with checks from a bank that is convenient to the employee’s workplace where they can cash them for the full amount of wages due. |
No, need employee consent |
New Jersey |
Employers may distribute wages this way as payment if the individual employee consents to it. |
No, need employee consent |
New Mexico |
Wages may be paid, with the voluntary authorization of the employer, employee, and financial institution, by depositing them into the employee’s account in any bank, savings and loan association, credit union, or other financial institution authorized by the United States. |
No, need employee consent |
New York State |
Before an employer can pay or deposit an employee’s net wage or salary in a bank or other financial institution, the employer needs written consent from the employee, unless the employee works in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity earning more than $1,300 a week. |
Need employee permission, with some exceptions |
North Carolina |
Employers may pay wages by direct deposit if payments are made in full on designated paydays, subject to authorized deductions and legal withholdings. Employees must be free to choose their own financial institution if this is the only option offered. |
Yes, with certain stipulations |
North Dakota |
Employers may require direct deposit of paychecks in the financial institution of the employee’s choice. If an employer also offers wage payment with a pay card (stored value card), the employee may choose to be paid with a paycard instead. |
Yes, with certain stipulations |
Ohio |
Ohio does not explicitly allow or prohibit employers from requiring direct deposit. |
No |
Oklahoma |
An employer must pay wages in cash, by electronic means, or by checks or drafts that are convertible into cash on demand at full face value. As of November 1, 2022, employers have the discretion to pay employee wages by deposit on payday at the employee’s designated financial institution or, if the employee does not consent or designate a financial institution, to a payroll card account. |
Yes |
Oregon |
Employers may use direct deposit without employee consent, but the employee may opt out , either verbally or in writing. |
Yes, with certain stipulations |
Pennsylvania |
Permitted only with prior written permission of the employee. |
No, need employee consent |
Rhode Island |
Direct deposit is only permissible upon written request of employees and consent of the employer. |
No, need employee consent |
South Carolina |
Employers are permitted if payments are made through a federally insured financial institution in South Carolina. Employees must be given a statement of earnings and withholdings. Deposit plans must allow each employee at least one free withdrawal for each deposit. |
Yes, with certain stipulations |
South Dakota |
Employers are permitted to require it. |
Yes |
Tennessee |
Employers may use direct deposit as a method of paying wages. The state attorney general has issued an opinion seeming to say that employers can require direct deposit. |
Not determined |
Texas |
Employers who pay by direct deposit must:
- Notify each affected employee in writing, at least 60 days before the date when the direct deposit payroll system is scheduled to begin, that the employer is adopting a direct deposit payroll system.
- Obtain information required by the employee’s financial institution that would be necessary to implement the electronic funds transfer.
|
No, need employee consent |
Utah |
Permitted, but an employee may refuse to have their wages deposited by electronic transfer by filing a written request with the employer. However, an employee may not refuse to have wages deposited by electronic transfer if either of the following occurs:
- For the calendar year preceding the pay period for which the employee is being paid, the employer’s federal employment tax deposits were equal to or more than $250,000
- At least two-thirds of the employees of the employer have their wages deposited by electronic transfer
|
Yes, with certain stipulations |
Vermont |
Employers must have written authorization from employees. |
No, need employee consent |
Virginia |
Employers cannot require the direct deposit of paychecks. If an employee who is hired after January 1, 2010, fails to designate an account for the receipt of direct deposits, the employer may pay wages or salaries to such employee by credit to a prepaid debit card or card account. |
No, need employee consent |
Washington |
The Department of Washington Labor and Industries says employers can require direct deposit of paychecks (with no cost to the employee). |
Yes, with certain stipulations |
West Virginia |
Per Virginia code, any person, firm, or corporation may compensate employees for services by cash order, which may include checks, direct deposits, payroll cards, or money orders. Banks must be convenient to the place of employment where suitable arrangements have been made for the cashing of the checks by employees, or deposit of funds for employees for the full amount of wages. |
Yes, with certain stipulations |
Wisconsin |
Employers may require direct deposit if employees are given the right to designate the recipient bank and there are no charges to the employees for it. Exceptions are necessary for individuals who are ineligible for checking or savings accounts. |
Yes, with some exceptions |
Wyoming |
Permitted when employees voluntarily authorize it. |
No, employers may not |